To My Reasonable? Christian Readers
I have been hosting a conversation on my blog between an atheist (Eric) and a loyal christian reader (Dave) recently that brings the forefront again just how warped the thinking of a seemingly liberal or reasonable christian can be . If you would like to read the entire conversation between Dave and Eric, the comments in the post can be found here. BTW, I have no problem with stepping out of conversations in my own blog when someone else is making my point better than I could. Thanks Eric.
The most disturbing thing in Dave's reply is this comment regarding the biblical references to the obvious cruelty and murderous nature of the christian god:
"In each case where God or Jesus pass judgment on the wicked (my emphasis), they are warned of punishment. While the SAB may consider this cruel, I believe it's only because they assume God's judgments to be unfair. Any system of order that attempts to maintain goodness and punish evil is going to have...punishments. Whether or not that is cruel is relative."So the clarify what Dave is saying, the wicked women and children murdered at god's command in the bible were warned by God and the fact that they didn't flee, repent, commit suicide etc. (which they wouldn't be allowed to do by their wicked husbands) justifies them being murdered. Is this correct? So what about the wicked virgin girls, Dave, who were spared so they could be raped by your god's holy warriors? They deserved this? When god murders, burns, rapes and destroys it is 'fair' punishment? For what? Not heeding his 'warnings'?
If you (christians) are going to post on this site under the guise of being a reasonable and decent human beings, then I would warn you that you are going to be held to your own words and thoughts regarding god and morality and anything that you post about here. Dave's reply demonstrates how a seemingly normal and decent human being under the influence of religious dogma can justify the most horrible and unspeakable and unjust acts.
Dave's reply also demonstrates the negative effect that religious dogma has on the morality of a human being. While Dave may well be a kind and loving human being (I don't really know him), he feels compelled to defend torture, murder, rape and brutality that is ordered or committed by his god. What compels a human being to defend these things with such a ridiculous argument (god warned them) rather than to simply say that those things are horrible and he does not defend them? Such is the mind and morality of a believer.
atheism
christianity
morality




